1923 Season 2’s Most Controversial Storyline Sparks Outrage—Star Defends It! Do Fans Agree? 🤔🔥📺

After becoming the latest storyline in Taylor Sheridan’s shows to garner controversy, Madison Elise Rogers is weighing in on Lindy and Donald’s relationship in 1923 season 2. Former episodes of the Yellowstone prequel saw Lindy (Rogers), an escort hired by Donald (Timothy Dalton), performing abusive acts on her companion Christy (Cailyn Rice). As their disturbing relationship escalates, Dalton’s magnate happily watches the prostitutes strike each other, and it was revealed in 1923 season 2 that Donald keeps the women around. Things have severely worsened since, and it appears that Lindy has gained some sense of control over Christy.

During an interview with ScreenRant for 1923 season 2, Rogers defended the relationship between Lindy and Donald. She explained that some women might have gone through a dynamic like Lindy’s, where an “obviously very dangerous” man holds power over her. She believes that “there’s something realistic about” the entire scenario. Rogers recognized the terrifying nature of that storyline and added that, while Lindy could feel supported, she is also focused on survival and is “brainwashed” by Donald. Read more of Rogers’ comments below:

For one, I think a lot of women can see themselves in a similar position or maybe have experience, to a smaller degree, of being in a situation with a man that’s powerful and dangerous. I think that is scary, and I think there’s something realistic about it. I feel like, if Whitfield existed, this would be something that actually happens. But I get it. I know it feels brutal, but I think it’s showing this very real side of a dangerous man and how he abuses his power. These women are just collateral in his scheme.

Speaking of Lindy in particular, I took it as she is in this house with this very wealthy, very powerful, and obviously very dangerous man. I think he’s given her this acceptance, or something along those lines, so I think she’s feeling favored by him. I think it’s also that she needs to survive. She is leaning into it, but I think she’s completely been brainwashed. She’s doing what she has to do, as gruesome as it is, and she’s trying to get through what she’s going through.

What This Means For 1923 Season 2
The Relationship Between Lindy & Donald May Continue

1923 season 2 has indicated that Lindy changed, particularly in how she reacts to Donald and his cruel ongoing tendencies. In previous episodes, she appeared fearful of Donald, having been physically and emotionally used to satisfy him. While harming Christy during the season 1 finale, Donald advises Lindy that happiness could be derived from power, and that he got enjoyment from watching them. Then, despite her seeming to momentarily accept that, he makes Lindy and Christy swap roles, much to her horror. It was a terrifying scenario that forced Lindy to recognize just how dangerous Donald could be.

During season 2, episode 1, “The Killing Season,” Lindy remains at Donald’s home and their relationship seemingly progresses beyond sexual interactions. After all, he discusses the upcoming trial with her. However, one shocking Donald scene revealed that the alarming behavior between him, Lindy, and Christy has continued. After opening a closet door, Lindy retrieves a naked Christy, who has visible scars everywhere, and informs her that she would be painfully disciplined if she does not comply, suggesting that Lindy and Donald are still abusing her. While they now know Donald’s dangerous nature, neither of them have escaped his control.

Taylor Sheridan’s Shows Have Ignited Controversy
Yellowstone, Landman, & 1923 Are All Controversial

Sheridan is certainly no stranger to controversy. Nearly every one of his shows has faced backlash at some point or another. Rumors continue to swirl that Kevin Costner left Yellowstone after a feud with Sheridan, and his exit caused the show to barrel to an early ending. The producer has also faced sharp criticism over his treatment of women and Indigenous Americans in Yellowstone, 1923, and other shows. These shows often rely on stereotypes and fail to properly develop many characters. Killers of the Flower Moon’s Lily Gladstone even called the depictions “Delusional!” and “Deplorable!” in a stark critique.

There have also been other narrative controversies, which are more aligned to the Lindy and Donald storyline. Landman regularly featured the 17-year-old Ainsley (Michelle Randolph) in sexual situations. While Rudolph was 27 years old, the constant sexualizing of her character drew controversy. Not every argument has been about moral judgment, however. There have also been arguments that none of Sheridan’s shows are historically accurate, which has alienated some viewers. Historical complaints are easy to overlook, however, given the seriousness of the other issues. Sexualizing minor characters, losing main cast members, and relying on stereotypes have been far more salient concerns.

Our Take On The 1923 Lindy & Donald Storyline
Something Bad Is Bound To Happen

Based on how the Lindy and Donald storyline has unfolded, and what is evidently happening to Christy, something terrible is likely on the horizon. As season 2 progresses, it’s worth wondering what their relationship will become, and if she and Christy will somehow be able to escape his iron grip. Rogers’ comments about surviving Donald’s influence could imply that Lindy willingly goes along with everything. That only makes Christy’s fate more troubling. It is difficult to see how the character could ever escape this terrifying situation, especially when she faces routine physical discipline. Every injury makes escape less likely.

If something happens to Christy in future episodes of 1923, however, Lindy could easily find them changing roles again.

Even if Christy is currently bearing the brunt of his need for power, Lindy is also in extreme danger. Should she ever overstep or act against him, though, Donald seems capable of inflicting heavy pain. By forcing Lindy and Christy to switch roles in that early meeting, he ensured that both would understand the importance of complying. He provided Lindy with a genuine warning. She has been heeding it so far, leaving Christy as the target. If something happens to Christy in future episodes of 1923, however, Lindy could easily find them changing roles again.

Related Posts

Kelly Reilly’s ‘Beth and Rip’ Yellowstone Spinoff Reveals Why You Should Ditch Taylor Sheridan If You Want to Succeed.

The Yellowstone universe is expanding yet again, and this time, Kelly Reilly’s much-anticipated Beth and Rip spinoff is at the center of attention. Fans of Yellowstone know…

Y: Marshals Cast Breakdown: Familiar Faces Return, But This Key Character Is Still Unconfirmed!

The Yellowstone universe continues to grow, and the anticipation around the upcoming series Y: Marshals is building by the day. Taylor Sheridan’s empire has already proven its…

“I wish it was sexier than that”: Taylor Sheridan Learned a Valuable Lesson in His Most Challenging Movie Before Yellowstone.. Taylor Sheridan has become a household name thanks to the enormous success of Yellowstone and its ever-expanding universe of spin-offs, but before he was redefining the television Western, he was grinding his way through some of Hollywood’s toughest lessons. Recently, Sheridan admitted that one of his most challenging movie experiences, long before Yellowstone existed, provided him with wisdom that shaped him into the storyteller he is today. With his trademark blunt humor, he confessed, “I wish it was sexier than that,” making clear that the road to success was paved with missteps, frustrations, and a lot of trial-and-error. Sheridan’s journey is a testament to persistence. Before his name became synonymous with hit series, he was best known to audiences as an actor. Many remember his role as David Hale on Sons of Anarchy, but Sheridan often recalls the difficulty of being an actor-for-hire, constantly at the mercy of casting decisions and executives. That frustration eventually pushed him to transition into writing and directing, though the early years of that career shift were anything but glamorous. The movie in question—his so-called “most challenging project”—was not the type of Hollywood breakthrough most writers dream about. It wasn’t a high-profile studio film, nor was it an indie darling that won accolades at Sundance. Instead, it was a grueling, underfunded project that Sheridan now looks back on with a mix of humility and appreciation. What made it challenging was not just the lack of resources, but the disconnect between his creative vision and the machinery of filmmaking that often stripped away authenticity. For Sheridan, who would later build Yellowstone around authenticity to ranch life and cowboy culture, that clash was a painful but essential lesson. In his own words, Sheridan noted that the experience taught him “what not to do” more than anything else. As he attempted to find his voice as a writer and storyteller, he was confronted with the realities of production—the compromises, the meddling, and the dilution of themes he cared about. It was, by his account, deeply frustrating. And yet, it hardened him. It forced him to recognize that if he wanted to tell the kinds of stories that mattered to him, he would need to do it his own way, on his own terms. That mindset is what would later lead him to insist on creative control when developing Yellowstone for Paramount. Sheridan’s quip—“I wish it was sexier than that”—speaks to his no-nonsense personality. Fans may imagine a dramatic, cinematic origin story for a man who now commands Hollywood power, but Sheridan is quick to undercut that fantasy. His truth is less glamorous: long days, tight budgets, difficult compromises, and a lingering sense of dissatisfaction. But embedded in that struggle was the foundation for the empire he would later build. The experience shaped his philosophy about storytelling. Sheridan realized that authenticity mattered more than spectacle. His later works—Sicario, Hell or High Water, and Wind River—reflect that commitment to grounded realism, unflinching grit, and morally complex characters. Without the sting of that difficult film, he may not have pursued the stripped-down, emotionally raw style that has now become his trademark. More importantly, it taught Sheridan about resilience. In Hollywood, many careers die after a bad experience. Scripts get shelved, directors burn out, and writers compromise until their voices are unrecognizable. Sheridan chose the opposite path. Instead of giving up or bowing to pressure, he doubled down on the importance of staying true to himself. That resilience echoes in the stories he writes—characters who endure pain, fight against impossible odds, and cling to their values even when the world tells them otherwise. Yellowstone is the ultimate culmination of those lessons. The series embodies Sheridan’s belief in authenticity, from its rugged depiction of ranch life to its refusal to water down the brutality of the West. Beth Dutton’s razor-sharp wit, Rip Wheeler’s unwavering loyalty, and John Dutton’s fight to protect his land are all born of Sheridan’s insistence on telling stories with emotional truth. The massive success of Yellowstone is proof that the lessons he learned in that difficult early film were not wasted but instead transformed into a philosophy that resonates with millions of viewers. Sheridan himself acknowledges that Yellowstone would not exist without those early struggles. His “non-sexy” lesson from a failed or difficult project became the fire that fueled his drive. Every frustration became a reminder of what he never wanted to compromise again. Every disappointing choice made by others on that project reinforced his determination to be the one in charge of his own stories. By the time Paramount came knocking, Sheridan had sharpened his voice into something powerful, uncompromising, and distinctly his own. Fans often look at Sheridan now—commanding one of the most powerful storytelling empires on television—and imagine that he has always been destined for greatness. But Sheridan himself resists that narrative. He wants people to understand that failure, difficulty, and humility are part of success. His career is proof that the most important lessons often come not from triumphs but from challenges that break you down and force you to rebuild stronger.

Taylor Sheridan has become a household name thanks to the enormous success of Yellowstone and its ever-expanding universe of spin-offs, but before he was redefining the television…

Whew!NOTIZIE SCIOCCANTI!! Yellowstone Spoiler: Lloyd Joins Beth & Rip in Explosive Yellowstone Spin-Off – Is He About to Change Everything

Yellowstone has built its legacy on gripping drama, fierce family loyalty, and explosive power struggles, and now a shocking spoiler reveals that one of the most beloved…

“It was a miserable state”: Taylor Sheridan reveals h0rrifying details about filming 1883 with Sam.

Behind the Scenes of 1883: A Test of Endurance Filming 1883, the prequel to Yellowstone, was an arduous endeavor that pushed the cast and crew to their…

Taylor Sheridan’s Horrific Zack Snyder Comparison Could Finally Open His Eyes After Yellowstone and 1923 Season 2 Debacle

Taylor Sheridan’s Recent Challenges: A Critical Examination Taylor Sheridan, acclaimed for his work on Yellowstone and its prequels, has recently faced significant criticism regarding his storytelling choices….

You cannot copy content of this page