Father Renaud Became What He Hated About Teonna Rainwater In 1923 Season 2

Father Renaud (Sebastian Roché) went through a complete transformation in 1923 season 2, and he ended up becoming the thing he hated about Teonna Rainwater (Aminah Nieves). Since the end of 1923 season 1, when Teonna killed the nuns at the boarding school, Renaud and Teonna have been mortal enemies. He enlisted the help of Marshal Kent (Jamie McShane), tracked Teonna all the way from Montana to Texas, and even got his hands bloody in the process. It wasn’t until the ending of 1923 season 2, episode 6, however, that they actually met face-to-face for the final time.

By the time Renaud and Teonna finally met each other, however, neither of them were the same people who had left Montana. Teonna started and lost her first romance with Pete Plenty Clouds (Jeremy Gauna) and she had finally found some happiness while traveling with Runs His Horse (Michael Spears) only to watch him die. Renaud’s transformation was more overt, however, and he somehow became even worse than he was while abusing Teonna at the boarding school. By the time he became one of 1923 season 2, episode 6’s major character deaths, Father Renaud became exactly the thing he thought Teonna was.

Father Renaud Became What He Hated About Teonna Rainwater & Marshal Kent In 1923 Season 2
Renaud Hated Teonna Because She Used Violence To Punish Cruel People & He Did The Same To Kent

Father Renaud hated Teonna because she killed three of the nuns in his boarding school, but there was more to it than that. Teonna used violence to punish cruel people like Sister Mary (Jennifer Ehle) and keep them from abusing their power to hurt more people. When Renaud killed Marshal Kent for his unnecessary cruelty towards Native Americans, he did exactly the same thing as Teonna, and he committed the same “crime” he was hunting her for. He used violence to stop Kent’s cruelty, but his twisted sense of faith and ideas about Native Americans kept Renaud from seeing just how similar he was to Teonna.

Renaud became extremely similar to Teonna in 1923 season 2, partly because he saw himself reflected in Marshal Kent. Throughout their journey, Kent drew parallels between himself and Renaud. For instance, he mentioned several times the graveyard behind the boarding school, and he was right to draw those comparisons. Renaud and Kent both abused their power – as a member of the clergy and as an officer of the law, respectively – to hurt vulnerable people. Kent just took it to a harsher extreme. Renaud must have known on some level that Teonna was just as justified in killing the nuns as he was in killing Kent.

Renaud’s Twisted Sense Of Faith In 1923 Explained
Renaud Was Able To Justify All Manner Of Cruelty As Serving God

Father Renaud was able to justify all his atrocities and horrible deeds because of his wildly warped sense of faith. As a Catholic priest, Renaud was supposed to love his neighbor and do unto the least of his brothers and sisters as he would do unto Jesus Christ himself. Somehow, Renaud managed to twist that message into his cruel and cynical view that the only way to “love” Teonna and the other Crow girls at his school was to beat them into assimilation. He genuinely believed that he was helping Native Americans by forcing them to accept Christianity, and he took a very Macchiavellan approach to that task.

Renaud’s problem wasn’t so much with Catholic doctrine as it was with his very notion of good and evil and his bigoted view that Native Americans were heathens and less than white Christians. That utterly vile view of the world is the same reason Renaud was alright with murdering Marshal Kent: because the end was ridding the world of another evil murderer, the means of killing him were justified. Renaud could justify almost anything by viewing his own actions as a necessary evil to serve God’s will.

Renaud’s Journey In 1923 Season 2 Drove Him To Become A Killer
Renaud Was Always Sick, But The Arduous Journey To Texas Rotted Him To The Core

One of the most interesting things about Father Renaud in 1923 season 2 is trying to pinpoint exactly when he made the transition from a horribly cruel priest to a full-blown murderer. Somewhere during the journey from Montana to Texas, something inside of Renaud snapped spiritually, mentally, or both. He either witnessed Kent commit one too many atrocities or couldn’t handle killing a Comanche child, as he did in 1923 season 2, episode 2. Renaud’s last straw was watching Kent kill Pete Plenty Clouds in cold blood. By that point, even murder was on the table.

Renaud’s devolution into murder is likely also why he was so obsessed with getting Teonna to repent and accept salvation. Either consciously or unconsciously, Renaud likely saw the parallels between himself and Teonna. On some level, he knew that he had killed two men in cold blood, and he knew that he needed redemption to avoid perdition. Renaud needed Teonna to accept salvation because he needed to know that he could accept it himself. When she refused, it sent Renaud spiraling, and gave Teonna a chance to see the end of 1923 season 2 alive.

Related Posts

Kelly Reilly’s ‘Beth and Rip’ Yellowstone Spinoff Reveals Why You Should Ditch Taylor Sheridan If You Want to Succeed.

The Yellowstone universe is expanding yet again, and this time, Kelly Reilly’s much-anticipated Beth and Rip spinoff is at the center of attention. Fans of Yellowstone know…

Y: Marshals Cast Breakdown: Familiar Faces Return, But This Key Character Is Still Unconfirmed!

The Yellowstone universe continues to grow, and the anticipation around the upcoming series Y: Marshals is building by the day. Taylor Sheridan’s empire has already proven its…

“I wish it was sexier than that”: Taylor Sheridan Learned a Valuable Lesson in His Most Challenging Movie Before Yellowstone.. Taylor Sheridan has become a household name thanks to the enormous success of Yellowstone and its ever-expanding universe of spin-offs, but before he was redefining the television Western, he was grinding his way through some of Hollywood’s toughest lessons. Recently, Sheridan admitted that one of his most challenging movie experiences, long before Yellowstone existed, provided him with wisdom that shaped him into the storyteller he is today. With his trademark blunt humor, he confessed, “I wish it was sexier than that,” making clear that the road to success was paved with missteps, frustrations, and a lot of trial-and-error. Sheridan’s journey is a testament to persistence. Before his name became synonymous with hit series, he was best known to audiences as an actor. Many remember his role as David Hale on Sons of Anarchy, but Sheridan often recalls the difficulty of being an actor-for-hire, constantly at the mercy of casting decisions and executives. That frustration eventually pushed him to transition into writing and directing, though the early years of that career shift were anything but glamorous. The movie in question—his so-called “most challenging project”—was not the type of Hollywood breakthrough most writers dream about. It wasn’t a high-profile studio film, nor was it an indie darling that won accolades at Sundance. Instead, it was a grueling, underfunded project that Sheridan now looks back on with a mix of humility and appreciation. What made it challenging was not just the lack of resources, but the disconnect between his creative vision and the machinery of filmmaking that often stripped away authenticity. For Sheridan, who would later build Yellowstone around authenticity to ranch life and cowboy culture, that clash was a painful but essential lesson. In his own words, Sheridan noted that the experience taught him “what not to do” more than anything else. As he attempted to find his voice as a writer and storyteller, he was confronted with the realities of production—the compromises, the meddling, and the dilution of themes he cared about. It was, by his account, deeply frustrating. And yet, it hardened him. It forced him to recognize that if he wanted to tell the kinds of stories that mattered to him, he would need to do it his own way, on his own terms. That mindset is what would later lead him to insist on creative control when developing Yellowstone for Paramount. Sheridan’s quip—“I wish it was sexier than that”—speaks to his no-nonsense personality. Fans may imagine a dramatic, cinematic origin story for a man who now commands Hollywood power, but Sheridan is quick to undercut that fantasy. His truth is less glamorous: long days, tight budgets, difficult compromises, and a lingering sense of dissatisfaction. But embedded in that struggle was the foundation for the empire he would later build. The experience shaped his philosophy about storytelling. Sheridan realized that authenticity mattered more than spectacle. His later works—Sicario, Hell or High Water, and Wind River—reflect that commitment to grounded realism, unflinching grit, and morally complex characters. Without the sting of that difficult film, he may not have pursued the stripped-down, emotionally raw style that has now become his trademark. More importantly, it taught Sheridan about resilience. In Hollywood, many careers die after a bad experience. Scripts get shelved, directors burn out, and writers compromise until their voices are unrecognizable. Sheridan chose the opposite path. Instead of giving up or bowing to pressure, he doubled down on the importance of staying true to himself. That resilience echoes in the stories he writes—characters who endure pain, fight against impossible odds, and cling to their values even when the world tells them otherwise. Yellowstone is the ultimate culmination of those lessons. The series embodies Sheridan’s belief in authenticity, from its rugged depiction of ranch life to its refusal to water down the brutality of the West. Beth Dutton’s razor-sharp wit, Rip Wheeler’s unwavering loyalty, and John Dutton’s fight to protect his land are all born of Sheridan’s insistence on telling stories with emotional truth. The massive success of Yellowstone is proof that the lessons he learned in that difficult early film were not wasted but instead transformed into a philosophy that resonates with millions of viewers. Sheridan himself acknowledges that Yellowstone would not exist without those early struggles. His “non-sexy” lesson from a failed or difficult project became the fire that fueled his drive. Every frustration became a reminder of what he never wanted to compromise again. Every disappointing choice made by others on that project reinforced his determination to be the one in charge of his own stories. By the time Paramount came knocking, Sheridan had sharpened his voice into something powerful, uncompromising, and distinctly his own. Fans often look at Sheridan now—commanding one of the most powerful storytelling empires on television—and imagine that he has always been destined for greatness. But Sheridan himself resists that narrative. He wants people to understand that failure, difficulty, and humility are part of success. His career is proof that the most important lessons often come not from triumphs but from challenges that break you down and force you to rebuild stronger.

Taylor Sheridan has become a household name thanks to the enormous success of Yellowstone and its ever-expanding universe of spin-offs, but before he was redefining the television…

Whew!NOTIZIE SCIOCCANTI!! Yellowstone Spoiler: Lloyd Joins Beth & Rip in Explosive Yellowstone Spin-Off – Is He About to Change Everything

Yellowstone has built its legacy on gripping drama, fierce family loyalty, and explosive power struggles, and now a shocking spoiler reveals that one of the most beloved…

“It was a miserable state”: Taylor Sheridan reveals h0rrifying details about filming 1883 with Sam.

Behind the Scenes of 1883: A Test of Endurance Filming 1883, the prequel to Yellowstone, was an arduous endeavor that pushed the cast and crew to their…

Taylor Sheridan’s Horrific Zack Snyder Comparison Could Finally Open His Eyes After Yellowstone and 1923 Season 2 Debacle

Taylor Sheridan’s Recent Challenges: A Critical Examination Taylor Sheridan, acclaimed for his work on Yellowstone and its prequels, has recently faced significant criticism regarding his storytelling choices….

You cannot copy content of this page