I’m Convinced Taylor Sheridan’s Decision in 1923 Season 2 Finale Will Lead To Bitter Dutton Sibling War in Yellowstone’s Prequel 1944 – News

Spoiler Alert !!!
Spoilers for 1923 Season 2 Ahead- Proceed with caution!

You know what they say: the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. And in the case of the Dutton family, that tree is a storm waiting to hit. After the gut-wrenching finale of 1923 Season 2, I can’t escape the feeling that the stage has been set for a sibling rivalry of epic proportions in the 1944 prequel.

With the birth of John Dutton II and Elizabeth’s child growing up in the shadow of the Dutton legacy, we’re in for a showdown that could split the family right down the middle. I mean, you don’t name a kid John Dutton and expect him to just sit quietly in the back, do you? These Duttons might clash, and if history is anything to go by, it won’t be pretty.

1944: The bitter sibling rivalry looming between John II & Elizabeth’s child

1923 Season 2 finale sets the stage for a bitter sibling rivalry in the upcoming 1944 prequel.  1923 season 2 | Credits: Paramount
When Alexandra, before her tragic death, named her son John Dutton, the significance wasn’t lost on me. With Spencer’s older brother having been the original John Dutton, her child now carries the torch as John Dutton II, bridging the bloodline between 1923 and Kevin Costner’s John Dutton III in Yellowstone.

Ergo, we can say that the little boy is the key to the past and future of the Dutton family. Also, the birth of this child isn’t just a plot device—it’s a full-blown time bomb ticking, ready to explode in the upcoming 1944 prequel.

But let’s not forget about Elizabeth. Her return to the East, pregnant with Jack’s child, has set the stage for some juicy drama. It may seem like the end of her story in 1923, but this is where the Duttons shine—when you think they’re out, they’re never out. This child, born around the same time as John II, could easily find their way back to Montana in 1944.
The birth of John Dutton II marks the beginning of a major shift in the Dutton family legacy. Helen Mirren and Michelle Randolph in 1923 | Credit: Paramount
Here’s where things get murky: Elizabeth’s child might not just return to learn about their roots. There’s a chance they might want to lay claim to the Yellowstone itself. That means if this kid takes a page from Jamie Dutton’s playbook, there could be a serious challenge to John II’s claim to the ranch. Imagine it: two cousins, both determined to rule the same land, their fates forever entwined by blood and ambition. I’m telling you—this could lead to the most dramatic sibling rivalry yet.

Could we see John II and Elizabeth’s child come to blows over the ranch? Absolutely. And the beauty of it all is that Taylor Sheridan has masterfully laid the groundwork for this conflict in the 1923 season 2 finale.

By planting the seeds of this rivalry now, he’s giving us a glimpse into the future of 1944—a future where the Duttons, no longer united, could tear each other apart in their desperate bid for control of the land that has defined them.

1923 left us hanging—Now 1944 must deliver the Dutton family’s legacy or risk falling flat

As 1923 ends and we look forward to the 1944 prequel, I can’t help but wonder what’s next for the Duttons.

Season 2 of 1923 had the perfect opportunity to give us a compelling bridge to 1944. This was the time to lay the foundation for the next generation of Duttons, especially with characters like Spencer and Alexandra (Julia Schlaepfer) in the mix. Instead, we saw one character’s arc basically disappear into thin air, while others were treated like pawns in a game that no one even cared to play.
The rivalry between John II and Elizabeth’s child could be a key plotline for 1944. Harrison Ford, Robert Patrick, and Jeffrey Leaf in 1923 | Credit: Paramount
By disappearing, I’m talking about the fate of Alex, Spencer Dutton’s (Brandon Sklenar) love interest, who was left in a state of limbo at the end of 1923’s second season. Fans were heartbroken when she died tragically, alone in the unforgiving cold, from frostbite and hypothermia. Her death, though devastating, felt like a finality that would push Spencer into a darker place. However, 1944 brings her back into the conversation—and not in the way fans were hoping.

The fire that was ignited in 1923, despite its flaws, has the potential to burn even brighter in 1944, but only if the show chooses to take its time and fully explore the consequences of the family’s fractured relationships. The question isn’t just about who survives the inevitable war for the land; it’s about who survives the war for the Dutton legacy.

And if 1944 doesn’t give us the deep, meaningful conflict I’m hoping for, then the entire Dutton family story could come crashing down like a house of cards. In short, 1923 left us hanging. But now, it’s up to 1944 to pick up the pieces, or else the Dutton legacy may be nothing more than a fleeting shadow of what it could have been.

The drama is ripe for the picking, and the Duttons—whether fighting for survival or legacy—are not to be underestimated!

1923 season 2 is streaming on Paramount+.

Related Posts

Kelly Reilly’s ‘Beth and Rip’ Yellowstone Spinoff Reveals Why You Should Ditch Taylor Sheridan If You Want to Succeed.

The Yellowstone universe is expanding yet again, and this time, Kelly Reilly’s much-anticipated Beth and Rip spinoff is at the center of attention. Fans of Yellowstone know…

Y: Marshals Cast Breakdown: Familiar Faces Return, But This Key Character Is Still Unconfirmed!

The Yellowstone universe continues to grow, and the anticipation around the upcoming series Y: Marshals is building by the day. Taylor Sheridan’s empire has already proven its…

“I wish it was sexier than that”: Taylor Sheridan Learned a Valuable Lesson in His Most Challenging Movie Before Yellowstone.. Taylor Sheridan has become a household name thanks to the enormous success of Yellowstone and its ever-expanding universe of spin-offs, but before he was redefining the television Western, he was grinding his way through some of Hollywood’s toughest lessons. Recently, Sheridan admitted that one of his most challenging movie experiences, long before Yellowstone existed, provided him with wisdom that shaped him into the storyteller he is today. With his trademark blunt humor, he confessed, “I wish it was sexier than that,” making clear that the road to success was paved with missteps, frustrations, and a lot of trial-and-error. Sheridan’s journey is a testament to persistence. Before his name became synonymous with hit series, he was best known to audiences as an actor. Many remember his role as David Hale on Sons of Anarchy, but Sheridan often recalls the difficulty of being an actor-for-hire, constantly at the mercy of casting decisions and executives. That frustration eventually pushed him to transition into writing and directing, though the early years of that career shift were anything but glamorous. The movie in question—his so-called “most challenging project”—was not the type of Hollywood breakthrough most writers dream about. It wasn’t a high-profile studio film, nor was it an indie darling that won accolades at Sundance. Instead, it was a grueling, underfunded project that Sheridan now looks back on with a mix of humility and appreciation. What made it challenging was not just the lack of resources, but the disconnect between his creative vision and the machinery of filmmaking that often stripped away authenticity. For Sheridan, who would later build Yellowstone around authenticity to ranch life and cowboy culture, that clash was a painful but essential lesson. In his own words, Sheridan noted that the experience taught him “what not to do” more than anything else. As he attempted to find his voice as a writer and storyteller, he was confronted with the realities of production—the compromises, the meddling, and the dilution of themes he cared about. It was, by his account, deeply frustrating. And yet, it hardened him. It forced him to recognize that if he wanted to tell the kinds of stories that mattered to him, he would need to do it his own way, on his own terms. That mindset is what would later lead him to insist on creative control when developing Yellowstone for Paramount. Sheridan’s quip—“I wish it was sexier than that”—speaks to his no-nonsense personality. Fans may imagine a dramatic, cinematic origin story for a man who now commands Hollywood power, but Sheridan is quick to undercut that fantasy. His truth is less glamorous: long days, tight budgets, difficult compromises, and a lingering sense of dissatisfaction. But embedded in that struggle was the foundation for the empire he would later build. The experience shaped his philosophy about storytelling. Sheridan realized that authenticity mattered more than spectacle. His later works—Sicario, Hell or High Water, and Wind River—reflect that commitment to grounded realism, unflinching grit, and morally complex characters. Without the sting of that difficult film, he may not have pursued the stripped-down, emotionally raw style that has now become his trademark. More importantly, it taught Sheridan about resilience. In Hollywood, many careers die after a bad experience. Scripts get shelved, directors burn out, and writers compromise until their voices are unrecognizable. Sheridan chose the opposite path. Instead of giving up or bowing to pressure, he doubled down on the importance of staying true to himself. That resilience echoes in the stories he writes—characters who endure pain, fight against impossible odds, and cling to their values even when the world tells them otherwise. Yellowstone is the ultimate culmination of those lessons. The series embodies Sheridan’s belief in authenticity, from its rugged depiction of ranch life to its refusal to water down the brutality of the West. Beth Dutton’s razor-sharp wit, Rip Wheeler’s unwavering loyalty, and John Dutton’s fight to protect his land are all born of Sheridan’s insistence on telling stories with emotional truth. The massive success of Yellowstone is proof that the lessons he learned in that difficult early film were not wasted but instead transformed into a philosophy that resonates with millions of viewers. Sheridan himself acknowledges that Yellowstone would not exist without those early struggles. His “non-sexy” lesson from a failed or difficult project became the fire that fueled his drive. Every frustration became a reminder of what he never wanted to compromise again. Every disappointing choice made by others on that project reinforced his determination to be the one in charge of his own stories. By the time Paramount came knocking, Sheridan had sharpened his voice into something powerful, uncompromising, and distinctly his own. Fans often look at Sheridan now—commanding one of the most powerful storytelling empires on television—and imagine that he has always been destined for greatness. But Sheridan himself resists that narrative. He wants people to understand that failure, difficulty, and humility are part of success. His career is proof that the most important lessons often come not from triumphs but from challenges that break you down and force you to rebuild stronger.

Taylor Sheridan has become a household name thanks to the enormous success of Yellowstone and its ever-expanding universe of spin-offs, but before he was redefining the television…

Whew!NOTIZIE SCIOCCANTI!! Yellowstone Spoiler: Lloyd Joins Beth & Rip in Explosive Yellowstone Spin-Off – Is He About to Change Everything

Yellowstone has built its legacy on gripping drama, fierce family loyalty, and explosive power struggles, and now a shocking spoiler reveals that one of the most beloved…

“It was a miserable state”: Taylor Sheridan reveals h0rrifying details about filming 1883 with Sam.

Behind the Scenes of 1883: A Test of Endurance Filming 1883, the prequel to Yellowstone, was an arduous endeavor that pushed the cast and crew to their…

Taylor Sheridan’s Horrific Zack Snyder Comparison Could Finally Open His Eyes After Yellowstone and 1923 Season 2 Debacle

Taylor Sheridan’s Recent Challenges: A Critical Examination Taylor Sheridan, acclaimed for his work on Yellowstone and its prequels, has recently faced significant criticism regarding his storytelling choices….

You cannot copy content of this page