Home Yellow Stone “Her de@th wasn’t for no reason”: Taylor Sheridan’s ‘1944’ Update Makes Alex’s Fate a Worse Mistake Than Kevin Costner Leaving Yellowstone

“Her de@th wasn’t for no reason”: Taylor Sheridan’s ‘1944’ Update Makes Alex’s Fate a Worse Mistake Than Kevin Costner Leaving Yellowstone

Yellow Stone · 18 May, 2025 · Comments off

Sometimes life hands you lemons, and sometimes it hands you the sourest of oranges. Taylor Sheridan’s decision to kill off Alex in 1923 left fans with more than just a bad aftertaste. We mean, c’mon—this was a character that was carved out with such grit, rawness, and depth, only to have her meet an unceremonious end with what some would say is no real purpose.

While Elsa’s death in 1883 was pivotal, pushing the narrative of the Dutton ranch forward, Alex’s demise just feels… unnecessary.
Alex’s death in 1923 feels unnecessary and leaves fans frustrated.
For many of us, there’s a real question here—why invest so much in shaping Alex into a strong, fierce woman, only to take her away before her story truly began? She went from a character who waited in the truck for a rescue to one who fought tooth and nail for survival.

1923 season 2 finale: Why Alex’s death feels unnecessary

As much as we try to remind ourselves that the storytelling in Yellowstone and its prequels has never been afraid to make bold decisions, Alex’s (Julia Schlaepfer) death just doesn’t sit right with us. Sure, Elsa’s death in 1883 set the stage for the legacy of the Duttons and their ranch, but Alex’s death feels like a punch below the belt without a real payoff.

Maybe it’s because she was one of the few characters in 1923 that had real promise, offering not just strength but a future with Spencer, a chance to solidify the modern family of the Duttons.

Taylor Sheridan had one chance to tie her fate into a meaningful narrative that could potentially push the Yellowstone universe forward. Instead, he gave us the opposite—an emotionally draining story where Alex’s survival was simply a stepping stone for other characters.
Taylor Sheridan’s decision to kill off Alex undermines her strong character development.
Alex’s arc showed so much growth. After everything she’d gone through, Sheridan decided to pull the rug out from under us by killing her off.

To take that away, to essentially cancel her character’s development with a premature death, feels like a cheap shot, leaving us to wonder what might have been. Was this a necessary step for the story, or was it just a poor decision?

Let’s see what fans are saying:

This move makes Kevin Costner’s departure from Yellowstone look like a decision made with precision, not because Sheridan decided to rip the heart out of his own narrative. Alex’s death, in particular, feels like a jarring misstep that not only undermines the character’s development but also leaves 1944—the upcoming prequel—shaky at best.

Brandon Sklenar’s return, Alex’s fate & the future of 1944

But there’s hope, though, with the potential return of Spencer in 1944. Brandon Sklenar has already expressed interest in reprising his role (see Variety), and we would love to see him back.

But the real question is whether it’ll be enough. How much will his journey matter without Alex by his side? In 1923, their relationship was central to the narrative, and with her death, it feels like a massive void has been left.

A hole that can’t just be filled by Spencer alone!

We mean, Spencer and Alex were meant to carry the torch forward, to solidify a new chapter of the Dutton legacy. Jack and Elizabeth don’t seem to have the grit needed to carry on. They might have the bloodline, but they lack the strength that Spencer and Alex possessed.

This is not just about Alex. That being said, Taylor Sheridan had a real opportunity to make 1923 Season 2 set us up for something epic in 1944, but instead, he left us with more loose ends than a cheap sweater.

There was so much potential to develop Banner’s story further, to create a narrative of redemption and forgiveness. But Sheridan decided to leave Banner hanging at the edge of ruin.
Elsa’s death in 1883 was pivotal for the Dutton ranch's legacy, but Alex’s death lacks a clear purpose.
Now, with 1944 on the horizon, there’s an air of unease around what Sheridan will do next. Will he pick up the pieces from this mess, or will he continue to weave a story that leaves us second-guessing every move he makes?

The future of the ranch, of the legacy of the Duttons, might now hinge on Spencer’s shoulders alone. And honestly, without Alex beside him, it feels like a hollow promise.

The ranch, as fans like to speculate, might rightfully belong to Jack, but we wonder if that inheritance would even matter. If Jack’s children are anything like him, incapable and weak, the ranch might find its way to Spencer and his heirs.

admin

Related Posts

Yellow Stone

Kelly Reilly’s ‘Beth and Rip’ Yellowstone Spinoff Reveals Why You Should Ditch Taylor Sheridan If You Want to Succeed.

· 4 September, 2025 · Comments off

The Yellowstone universe is expanding yet again, and this time, Kelly Reilly’s much-anticipated Beth and Rip spinoff is at the center of attention. Fans of Yellowstone know…

Yellow Stone

Y: Marshals Cast Breakdown: Familiar Faces Return, But This Key Character Is Still Unconfirmed!

· 4 September, 2025 · Comments off

The Yellowstone universe continues to grow, and the anticipation around the upcoming series Y: Marshals is building by the day. Taylor Sheridan’s empire has already proven its…

Yellow Stone

“I wish it was sexier than that”: Taylor Sheridan Learned a Valuable Lesson in His Most Challenging Movie Before Yellowstone.. Taylor Sheridan has become a household name thanks to the enormous success of Yellowstone and its ever-expanding universe of spin-offs, but before he was redefining the television Western, he was grinding his way through some of Hollywood’s toughest lessons. Recently, Sheridan admitted that one of his most challenging movie experiences, long before Yellowstone existed, provided him with wisdom that shaped him into the storyteller he is today. With his trademark blunt humor, he confessed, “I wish it was sexier than that,” making clear that the road to success was paved with missteps, frustrations, and a lot of trial-and-error. Sheridan’s journey is a testament to persistence. Before his name became synonymous with hit series, he was best known to audiences as an actor. Many remember his role as David Hale on Sons of Anarchy, but Sheridan often recalls the difficulty of being an actor-for-hire, constantly at the mercy of casting decisions and executives. That frustration eventually pushed him to transition into writing and directing, though the early years of that career shift were anything but glamorous. The movie in question—his so-called “most challenging project”—was not the type of Hollywood breakthrough most writers dream about. It wasn’t a high-profile studio film, nor was it an indie darling that won accolades at Sundance. Instead, it was a grueling, underfunded project that Sheridan now looks back on with a mix of humility and appreciation. What made it challenging was not just the lack of resources, but the disconnect between his creative vision and the machinery of filmmaking that often stripped away authenticity. For Sheridan, who would later build Yellowstone around authenticity to ranch life and cowboy culture, that clash was a painful but essential lesson. In his own words, Sheridan noted that the experience taught him “what not to do” more than anything else. As he attempted to find his voice as a writer and storyteller, he was confronted with the realities of production—the compromises, the meddling, and the dilution of themes he cared about. It was, by his account, deeply frustrating. And yet, it hardened him. It forced him to recognize that if he wanted to tell the kinds of stories that mattered to him, he would need to do it his own way, on his own terms. That mindset is what would later lead him to insist on creative control when developing Yellowstone for Paramount. Sheridan’s quip—“I wish it was sexier than that”—speaks to his no-nonsense personality. Fans may imagine a dramatic, cinematic origin story for a man who now commands Hollywood power, but Sheridan is quick to undercut that fantasy. His truth is less glamorous: long days, tight budgets, difficult compromises, and a lingering sense of dissatisfaction. But embedded in that struggle was the foundation for the empire he would later build. The experience shaped his philosophy about storytelling. Sheridan realized that authenticity mattered more than spectacle. His later works—Sicario, Hell or High Water, and Wind River—reflect that commitment to grounded realism, unflinching grit, and morally complex characters. Without the sting of that difficult film, he may not have pursued the stripped-down, emotionally raw style that has now become his trademark. More importantly, it taught Sheridan about resilience. In Hollywood, many careers die after a bad experience. Scripts get shelved, directors burn out, and writers compromise until their voices are unrecognizable. Sheridan chose the opposite path. Instead of giving up or bowing to pressure, he doubled down on the importance of staying true to himself. That resilience echoes in the stories he writes—characters who endure pain, fight against impossible odds, and cling to their values even when the world tells them otherwise. Yellowstone is the ultimate culmination of those lessons. The series embodies Sheridan’s belief in authenticity, from its rugged depiction of ranch life to its refusal to water down the brutality of the West. Beth Dutton’s razor-sharp wit, Rip Wheeler’s unwavering loyalty, and John Dutton’s fight to protect his land are all born of Sheridan’s insistence on telling stories with emotional truth. The massive success of Yellowstone is proof that the lessons he learned in that difficult early film were not wasted but instead transformed into a philosophy that resonates with millions of viewers. Sheridan himself acknowledges that Yellowstone would not exist without those early struggles. His “non-sexy” lesson from a failed or difficult project became the fire that fueled his drive. Every frustration became a reminder of what he never wanted to compromise again. Every disappointing choice made by others on that project reinforced his determination to be the one in charge of his own stories. By the time Paramount came knocking, Sheridan had sharpened his voice into something powerful, uncompromising, and distinctly his own. Fans often look at Sheridan now—commanding one of the most powerful storytelling empires on television—and imagine that he has always been destined for greatness. But Sheridan himself resists that narrative. He wants people to understand that failure, difficulty, and humility are part of success. His career is proof that the most important lessons often come not from triumphs but from challenges that break you down and force you to rebuild stronger.

· 4 September, 2025 · Comments off

Taylor Sheridan has become a household name thanks to the enormous success of Yellowstone and its ever-expanding universe of spin-offs, but before he was redefining the television…

Yellow Stone

Whew!NOTIZIE SCIOCCANTI!! Yellowstone Spoiler: Lloyd Joins Beth & Rip in Explosive Yellowstone Spin-Off – Is He About to Change Everything

· 4 September, 2025 · Comments off

Yellowstone has built its legacy on gripping drama, fierce family loyalty, and explosive power struggles, and now a shocking spoiler reveals that one of the most beloved…

Yellow Stone

“It was a miserable state”: Taylor Sheridan reveals h0rrifying details about filming 1883 with Sam.

· 3 September, 2025 · Comments off

Behind the Scenes of 1883: A Test of Endurance Filming 1883, the prequel to Yellowstone, was an arduous endeavor that pushed the cast and crew to their…

Yellow Stone

Taylor Sheridan’s Horrific Zack Snyder Comparison Could Finally Open His Eyes After Yellowstone and 1923 Season 2 Debacle

· 3 September, 2025 · Comments off

Taylor Sheridan’s Recent Challenges: A Critical Examination Taylor Sheridan, acclaimed for his work on Yellowstone and its prequels, has recently faced significant criticism regarding his storytelling choices….

You cannot copy content of this page