Home Yellow Stone Why Spencer Dutton Blaming Whitfield For Alex’s Death In 1923 Still Makes No Sense Despite Brandon Sklenar’s Explanation – News

Why Spencer Dutton Blaming Whitfield For Alex’s Death In 1923 Still Makes No Sense Despite Brandon Sklenar’s Explanation – News

Yellow Stone · 21 April, 2025 · Comments off

The tactical conflict of 1923′s finale didn’t disappoint, with Jacob and his crew engaging in a shootout at the station with Whitfield’s men. The tension prompted Spencer to get off the train and head to the Yellowstone Ranch, where he finished off Banner’s army.

However, as her husband defended his family’s legacy, Alex Dutton succumbed to a horrible death in 1923’s finale, dying of hypothermia complications after she delivered her baby, whom she named John.

After Alex’s death, Spencer goes directly to Whitfield’s mansion with Jacob. Killing the man attacking his family made sense, but Spencer’s reasoning for killing Whitfield did not track.

Why Spencer Dutton Blaming Whitfield For Alex's Death In 1923 Still Makes No Sense Despite Brandon Sklenar's Explanation

Spencer Blames Whitfield For Alex Dutton’s Death In 1923 Season 2’s Finale

Spencer Kills Whitfield Vengefully In 1923 Season 2, Episode 7

When he asks his aunt about who led the attack against their family, Cara points Spencer to Donald Whitfield, and the war hero understandably wants to go after the assailant.

The morning after Alex passes away, Spencer unites with Jacob to fight the last battle in the family’s range war after bestowing his newborn baby to Cara. Spencer and Jacob proceed to storm the mining tycoon’s lavish mansion. When they arrive, Whitfield is dining with Lindy (Madison Elise Rogers) and Mabel (Virginia Gardner), removed completely from the bloody warfare that he sanctioned.

Spencer wounds Whitfield upon entering his dining room, and he fatally shoots Lindy as she rises to defend him. James Dutton’s (Tim McGraw) youngest son goes on to explain to Whitfield that he killed his wife.

Why Spencer Dutton Blaming Whitfield For Alex's Death In 1923 Still Makes No Sense Despite Brandon Sklenar's Explanation

While Donald insists he isn’t responsible, saying he doesn’t know Spencer’s wife, Dutton isn’t interested in what Whitfield has to say, other than getting the mining tycoon to repeat Alex’s name. When he asks Alex’s name, further questioning the war hero’s attack, Spencer shoots Whitfield in cold blood. Still, while Spencer has a plethora of reasons to blame Whitfield, Alex’s death isn’t among them.

Brandon Sklenar’s Reasoning For Spencer Blaming Whitfield For Alex’s Death Explained

Spencer Wrongfully Blames Whitfield For Prompting His Journey Home

Spencer blaming Whitfield for his wife’s death didn’t resonate with some viewers, and there’s a reason for that. Still, Brandon Sklenar explained that the confusion was due to creative decisions in an interview with the Hollywood Reporter.

He explained that quite a bit of dialogue was cut from Spencer Dutton’s scene with Whitfield. The star explained that the missing dialogue evoked an emotional moment for Spencer, and a creative decision was made that the follow-up to Spencer’s tragedy didn’t require the same emotional punch, with a longer monologue getting cut:

There was a bit of dialogue that I had in that [confrontation] scene, but we cut it out. Spencer was incredibly emotional during that bit of dialogue, and we had already had this emotional moment with Alex.

So it just felt like the balance would’ve been off, and they felt it was more effective to go right to the point with Whitfield. They felt that people would feel that and understand why without having to spell it out.

But initially, there was a bit of dialogue where Spencer essentially said the same thing: “You came after my family, and that forced me home.” He went through the chain of events as far as why he feels that Whitfield is responsible. So I think the fans of the show can understand why it’s Whitfield, without us fully explaining it, as you have.

None of this would have happened had Whitfield not come after the Dutton family. Alex would not have followed Spencer home, and she would not have gotten stranded in the snow. His family also wouldn’t be in the position they’re in, and Spencer wouldn’t be on this war path where he’s now standing there with a gun at Whitfield’s head. So it is his fault.

Brandon Sklenar explained that Spencer blamed Whitfield because the tycoon came after his family. Donald’s war on the Duttons forced Spencer home, with Cara writing the war hero that he needed to return, and her nephew ultimately heeding her call when he finally read the letter.

The attack on the Dutton family exacerbated the awful things happening to Alex Dutton in 1923, with the couple enduring life-threatening obstacles on their journey home, even before their separation at the end of 1923 season 1. While Sklenar is right that the war brought him home, he’s wrong about a pivotal detail.

Spencer Blaming Whitfield For Alex’s Death Still Makes No Sense

While it made for a dramatic ending, a closer look at 1923 season 1 reveals that Whitfield had absolutely no involvement whatsoever in Alex’s death, even with Sklenar’s justification. Whitfield knew nothing about the initial attack on the Dutton family in 1923 season 1, episode 3, which killed John Dutton I (James Badge Dale) and almost killed Jacob Dutton.

The villain isn’t introduced until 1923 season 1, episode 4, when Banner goes to his new partner after Creighton attacks the Dutton family over a dispute about his sheep. Banner asks Whitfield for an army, involving Donald, after the initial attack.

By the time Banner goes to Donald in 1923 season 1, episode 4, Spencer’s brother is already dead. Spencer’s uncle, Jacob, has already suffered life-threatening injuries after Banner shoots him in the chest multiple times with a Tommy gun. Spencer’s aunt had already written to him, urging her nephew to come home due to the rising tension at the ranch, putting his legacy in peril. All these events are what prompted the end of Spencer and Alex’s vacation, pulling them away from their cozy seaside hut in Zanzibar, Tanganyika, and they happened before the Scottish sheep herder ever involved Whitfield.

Brandon Sklenar’s response further confuses Spencer’s reasoning, wrongfully saying Whitfield prompted his journey home

Donald Whitfield getting involved in the Dutton family’s conflict after Cara sends word to her nephew is why Spencer’s claim feels out of place. While he certainly has it out for the family, Whitfield has nothing to do with Spencer coming home.

Banner is the one who instigated the war; Whitfield just exacerbated the conflict by supporting Creighton’s second, more drawn-out attack.

While Whitfield is certainly responsible for Spencer’s anguish, causing him to separate from his wife to fight a war as she delivered their baby, Brandon Sklenar’s response further confuses Spencer’s reasoning, wrongfully saying Whitfield prompted his journey home.

How 1923 Could Have Fixed Spencer Dutton’s Finale Scene With Donald Whitfield

Spencer Could Have Found Something Else To Blame Whitfield For

It makes sense that Yellowstone screenwriter Taylor Sheridan wanted to send 1923 off with a bang, and Spencer’s team-up with Jacob certainly delivered that.

The pair walking out of Whitfield’s mansion as a fire engulfs its remains is an epic 1923 moment, with stunning visual effects. However, a tweak to Spencer’s dialogue would have made the moment more impactful thematically, with Spencer properly placing blame on Whitfield to justify his scorn. Spencer, using a different reasoning for his attack on Whitfield in his home, could have preserved the scene while raising fewer eyebrows.

Maybe if Spencer had been with Alex, the outcome could have been different, giving Dutton plenty of reasons to blame the family’s nemesis.

While Whitfield wasn’t responsible for Alexandra of Sussex’s fate, he indeed caused Spencer’s family strife. Spencer could have blamed Whitfield for coming after his family more generally, which warranted the anger Spencer felt in their scene.

Spencer also could have focused on how Whitfield’s attack at the train station caused him to get separated from his wife, again, as she delivered their child. Maybe if Spencer had been with Alex, the outcome could have been different, giving Dutton plenty of reasons to blame the family’s nemesis. Instead, Sklenar’s explanation further muddles 1923’s inconsistency, ruling out more vague interpretations.

Source: Hollywood Reporter

Why Spencer Dutton Blaming Whitfield For Alex’s Death In 1923 Still Makes No Sense Despite Brandon Sklenar’s Explanation

Spencer Dutton in a close up in 1923’s finale

Alexandra and Spencer in 1923

Alex and Spencer with John Dutton II in 1923 season 2 finale

admin

Related Posts

Yellow Stone

Kelly Reilly’s ‘Beth and Rip’ Yellowstone Spinoff Reveals Why You Should Ditch Taylor Sheridan If You Want to Succeed.

· 4 September, 2025 · Comments off

The Yellowstone universe is expanding yet again, and this time, Kelly Reilly’s much-anticipated Beth and Rip spinoff is at the center of attention. Fans of Yellowstone know…

Yellow Stone

Y: Marshals Cast Breakdown: Familiar Faces Return, But This Key Character Is Still Unconfirmed!

· 4 September, 2025 · Comments off

The Yellowstone universe continues to grow, and the anticipation around the upcoming series Y: Marshals is building by the day. Taylor Sheridan’s empire has already proven its…

Yellow Stone

“I wish it was sexier than that”: Taylor Sheridan Learned a Valuable Lesson in His Most Challenging Movie Before Yellowstone.. Taylor Sheridan has become a household name thanks to the enormous success of Yellowstone and its ever-expanding universe of spin-offs, but before he was redefining the television Western, he was grinding his way through some of Hollywood’s toughest lessons. Recently, Sheridan admitted that one of his most challenging movie experiences, long before Yellowstone existed, provided him with wisdom that shaped him into the storyteller he is today. With his trademark blunt humor, he confessed, “I wish it was sexier than that,” making clear that the road to success was paved with missteps, frustrations, and a lot of trial-and-error. Sheridan’s journey is a testament to persistence. Before his name became synonymous with hit series, he was best known to audiences as an actor. Many remember his role as David Hale on Sons of Anarchy, but Sheridan often recalls the difficulty of being an actor-for-hire, constantly at the mercy of casting decisions and executives. That frustration eventually pushed him to transition into writing and directing, though the early years of that career shift were anything but glamorous. The movie in question—his so-called “most challenging project”—was not the type of Hollywood breakthrough most writers dream about. It wasn’t a high-profile studio film, nor was it an indie darling that won accolades at Sundance. Instead, it was a grueling, underfunded project that Sheridan now looks back on with a mix of humility and appreciation. What made it challenging was not just the lack of resources, but the disconnect between his creative vision and the machinery of filmmaking that often stripped away authenticity. For Sheridan, who would later build Yellowstone around authenticity to ranch life and cowboy culture, that clash was a painful but essential lesson. In his own words, Sheridan noted that the experience taught him “what not to do” more than anything else. As he attempted to find his voice as a writer and storyteller, he was confronted with the realities of production—the compromises, the meddling, and the dilution of themes he cared about. It was, by his account, deeply frustrating. And yet, it hardened him. It forced him to recognize that if he wanted to tell the kinds of stories that mattered to him, he would need to do it his own way, on his own terms. That mindset is what would later lead him to insist on creative control when developing Yellowstone for Paramount. Sheridan’s quip—“I wish it was sexier than that”—speaks to his no-nonsense personality. Fans may imagine a dramatic, cinematic origin story for a man who now commands Hollywood power, but Sheridan is quick to undercut that fantasy. His truth is less glamorous: long days, tight budgets, difficult compromises, and a lingering sense of dissatisfaction. But embedded in that struggle was the foundation for the empire he would later build. The experience shaped his philosophy about storytelling. Sheridan realized that authenticity mattered more than spectacle. His later works—Sicario, Hell or High Water, and Wind River—reflect that commitment to grounded realism, unflinching grit, and morally complex characters. Without the sting of that difficult film, he may not have pursued the stripped-down, emotionally raw style that has now become his trademark. More importantly, it taught Sheridan about resilience. In Hollywood, many careers die after a bad experience. Scripts get shelved, directors burn out, and writers compromise until their voices are unrecognizable. Sheridan chose the opposite path. Instead of giving up or bowing to pressure, he doubled down on the importance of staying true to himself. That resilience echoes in the stories he writes—characters who endure pain, fight against impossible odds, and cling to their values even when the world tells them otherwise. Yellowstone is the ultimate culmination of those lessons. The series embodies Sheridan’s belief in authenticity, from its rugged depiction of ranch life to its refusal to water down the brutality of the West. Beth Dutton’s razor-sharp wit, Rip Wheeler’s unwavering loyalty, and John Dutton’s fight to protect his land are all born of Sheridan’s insistence on telling stories with emotional truth. The massive success of Yellowstone is proof that the lessons he learned in that difficult early film were not wasted but instead transformed into a philosophy that resonates with millions of viewers. Sheridan himself acknowledges that Yellowstone would not exist without those early struggles. His “non-sexy” lesson from a failed or difficult project became the fire that fueled his drive. Every frustration became a reminder of what he never wanted to compromise again. Every disappointing choice made by others on that project reinforced his determination to be the one in charge of his own stories. By the time Paramount came knocking, Sheridan had sharpened his voice into something powerful, uncompromising, and distinctly his own. Fans often look at Sheridan now—commanding one of the most powerful storytelling empires on television—and imagine that he has always been destined for greatness. But Sheridan himself resists that narrative. He wants people to understand that failure, difficulty, and humility are part of success. His career is proof that the most important lessons often come not from triumphs but from challenges that break you down and force you to rebuild stronger.

· 4 September, 2025 · Comments off

Taylor Sheridan has become a household name thanks to the enormous success of Yellowstone and its ever-expanding universe of spin-offs, but before he was redefining the television…

Yellow Stone

Whew!NOTIZIE SCIOCCANTI!! Yellowstone Spoiler: Lloyd Joins Beth & Rip in Explosive Yellowstone Spin-Off – Is He About to Change Everything

· 4 September, 2025 · Comments off

Yellowstone has built its legacy on gripping drama, fierce family loyalty, and explosive power struggles, and now a shocking spoiler reveals that one of the most beloved…

Yellow Stone

“It was a miserable state”: Taylor Sheridan reveals h0rrifying details about filming 1883 with Sam.

· 3 September, 2025 · Comments off

Behind the Scenes of 1883: A Test of Endurance Filming 1883, the prequel to Yellowstone, was an arduous endeavor that pushed the cast and crew to their…

Yellow Stone

Taylor Sheridan’s Horrific Zack Snyder Comparison Could Finally Open His Eyes After Yellowstone and 1923 Season 2 Debacle

· 3 September, 2025 · Comments off

Taylor Sheridan’s Recent Challenges: A Critical Examination Taylor Sheridan, acclaimed for his work on Yellowstone and its prequels, has recently faced significant criticism regarding his storytelling choices….

You cannot copy content of this page